top of page
Background-1-rendered.jpg

Why Spring Is the Perfect Time to Invest in Video Content

As the days get longer and the weather begins to improve, businesses often start to shift focus. The early part of the year has been about planning, setting budgets, and building momentum. By the time spring arrives, attention turns towards execution.

For companies considering video content, this change in season offers more than just a psychological reset. It provides practical advantages that can significantly improve both the quality of content and the ease of production.


Lush garden with vibrant tulips in reds, oranges, and yellows. A fountain in the background under clear blue skies. Peaceful and bright.

Better Light, Better Results

Natural light plays a significant role in video production.

During winter, limited daylight hours can restrict filming schedules and reduce flexibility. Spring, by contrast, offers longer days and more consistent lighting conditions. This allows for more natural looking footage and a wider range of filming options.

Even indoor shoots benefit from improved ambient light, creating a more balanced and professional final result.


More Flexibility for Filming

Longer days also mean greater flexibility.

Filming can take place across a wider window, making it easier to coordinate with teams, clients, and locations. Outdoor filming becomes more viable, opening up opportunities for more dynamic and engaging content.

This flexibility often leads to better planning, smoother shoots, and stronger outcomes.


A Natural Time for Brand Refresh

Spring is often associated with change and renewal.

For businesses, this can be a useful moment to review how they present themselves. Video content can play a key role in that process. Updated brand films, refreshed service videos, and new social content can all help reposition a business for the months ahead.

This is particularly valuable as companies begin to push into Q2 and Q3 activity.

See how we approach video production


Content That Lasts Beyond the Season

One of the advantages of investing in video during spring is that the content can be used throughout the year.

A single shoot can produce multiple assets. Website videos, social clips, testimonials, and campaign content can all be captured at once and released over time.

This makes video a practical investment rather than a one-off activity.


Preparing for a Busier Period

As the year progresses, schedules tend to become more crowded. Holidays, events, and increased workload can make it harder to find time for production.

Filming earlier in the year allows businesses to build a bank of content before that pressure builds. It creates a more controlled and strategic approach to marketing.

Spring offers a combination of practical and strategic advantages for video production. Better conditions, more flexibility, and a natural moment for brand refresh all come together at the right time.

For businesses looking to strengthen their marketing, the question is not just whether to invest in video, but when.

For many, the answer is now.

Start a conversation with the team

Why Spring Is the Perfect Time to Invest in Video Content

Why Spring Is the Perfect Time to Invest in Video Content

Discover why spring is the ideal time for video production and how longer days and better conditions can improve your content.

See Post
Why Most Business Websites Do Not Convert As Well As They Should

Why Most Business Websites Do Not Convert As Well As They Should

Learn why many business websites fail to convert visitors into enquiries and how clearer messaging and structure can improve results.

See Post
Why Your Website Needs to Adapt to AI Search, Not Just Google

Why Your Website Needs to Adapt to AI Search, Not Just Google

Discover how AI search is changing online visibility and why your website must adapt beyond SEO to stay relevant and competitive.

See Post

Alegria Art

  • Novus
  • Feb 28, 2022
  • 3 min read

Little did Facebook know, when they launched their illustration system in 2017, they’d started the ‘corporate art-style’ bandwagon that torments the web today.


I’m sure, whilst browsing various websites and inevitably being forced to sit through ‘unskippable’ ads, we’ve all encountered these gangly, disproportionate, eternally cheery monstrosities that soullessly smile at us while promoting the evillest pyramid scheme ever seen. In fact, I saw one this morning whilst researching the topic. These flat non-humans belong to an art style family known as ‘Alegria’, which is Spanish for joy (though they deliver anything but). They’re a favourite amongst corporations but notoriously despised by the public, earning the nickname of ‘corporate art’.


But why has the infamous style become so widespread yet so hated? Its mass use is rooted in a trend of streamlining and convenience. ‘Flat art’, like Alegria, uses no lines, no shading, and doesn’t adhere to proportions, which makes it easy to replicate and quick to create. Characters are always positioned in vibrant and dynamic poses, even if they seem entirely unrelated to what they’re promoting; they exist to sell an image. These grinning blobs aim to be as inviting and inoffensive as possible to gain the trust of everyone by being innocuous, yet they achieve the opposite. Unrelatable, unevocative and unremarkable, this combination makes for a vacant and fake impression, only heightened by how omni-present it seems. It feels like Alegria will never end, but all trends are fated to die. Now that people are beginning to notice its suffocating presence, I can only imagine its lifespan will soon end.


A growing meme culture of spite towards the art style has emerged. Subreddits dedicated to hating on corporate graphic designs have thousands of members. Parodies of Alegria have accumulated over 100,000 likes, and a YouTube video by user ‘Solar Sands’ that criticises the art style has garnered more than 3 million views. With so much negative attention, it’s unlikely that marketers will commit to Alegria over new graphic design styles and approaches.


Brand image is important, but the band-wagoning of art style trends is risky, and it’s critical to know when to pull out. It’s proven that media that reaches high popularity becomes stale and distasteful once it’s overstayed its welcome—often becoming victim to high criticism after its peak. Furthermore, when it comes to methods as oversaturated as corporate art styles, you sacrifice individuality and all the perks that come with this—such as personality and a connection to your market. For instance, what does Alegria do for your brand if it looks just like everyone else’s? When the style has multiple coined terms to generalise it, such as ‘the big tech art style’ and ‘Corporate Memphis’, it’s safe to say that using it will make you ‘just another one of them’. Maybe not the image you’d want to portray.


This isn’t the first time vacant and simplified designs have seen mass disapproval. Minimalism amongst company logos has been a steady but sure process, with many renowned brands trimming their iconic emblems—often seeing a heavy backlash for their efforts. Whilst change is rarely met with cheers of support, annoyance over the widespread trend of reductionism is a justified gripe. Take the smoothening of the Firefox logo, for example; the beloved fox wrapped around the Earth has slowly been morphed into a few clean shapes hovering over a purple orb. I could find many logos aesthetically similar to the new Firefox design, but the original is one of a kind. That uniqueness is what forged people’s impression of Firefox, which makes it much more memorable than its cookie cutter redesign.


Discord, a popular voice chat and text app, recently redesigned its logo to appear smoother, more compact and more like a video game controller. Although there’s logic behind this decision, Discord sacrificed the previous dynamic design, which people related to the brand, for one that sat uncomfortably with users, who claimed it made Discord feel more ‘corporate’. Discord has always been a corporation, but its previous brand image distracted people from this fact and made it appear personable; reduction destroyed all this hard work.


The removal of coloured and textured features from the Pringle man, in favour of a ‘man’ staring vacantly, seemingly devoid of humanity, on their tubes, has taken away the human connection the original provided. The lack of humanisation within designs intended to be human just results in a bland mannequin that no one can identify with.


Minimalism as a category within the design world can be effective, but a fine line must be trod so that any reductionism doesn’t lead to downgrading. Unfortunately, Alegria has fallen victim to this.

bottom of page